Most Popular Tags
Search
| Pay cuts or jobs? A false choice |
|
|
|
| Written by Gordon Prentice | |||
| Wednesday, 18 January 2012 20:44 | |||
|
The BBC’s Nick Robinson tells us that Ed Miliband backs pay cuts. Oh dear! In his defence Miliband says “The priority has got to be to protect jobs.” I am left wondering how far you can take this approach before people start to say no. The most extreme example of wage cutting is happening here in Ontario where, on 1 January, the US multinational giant, Caterpillar, locked out nearly 500 workers at the plant in London, close to the American border. The plant’s previous owner, Progress Rail, was bought last year by a wholly owned Canadian subsidiary of Caterpillar. Now the company wants to slash their $35 hourly wages by half and significantly reduce their benefits. Caterpillar say they want to get wages and benefits in line with their US plants. If you go down this road where does it all stop? $10 an hour? This Saturday there will be a rally in the town and all the federal Party leaders have been invited. They will be asked the age old question: whose side are you on? With some politicians we already know the answer. Canada’s Conservative Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, looks the other way. He doesn’t want to get involved. But when Air Canada employees were on strike last year, Harper was the first to threaten back-to-work legislation. We wait for other politicians to find their voice. Goldman Sachs bonuses average £240,000 A world away from the picket line in London, Ontario, the 1% and their helpers continue to cash in. As it happens, I’ve just seen the terrific film, Margin Call, which takes the audience into the heart of a US investment bank just as finance capitalism goes into meltdown. Now, a few years later, and after humungous amounts of public money have baled out private banks, we realise little has changed. Goldman Sachs’ 95 so-called “code staff” based in the UK share a staggering £175m topped up with additional millions in “Restricted Stock Units”. Seems to me these stock options should be banned outright. And we should return to progressive taxation to make sure the wealthiest pay their fair share. What does it take for people to feel outrage at what is happening? Mitt Romney paying tax at 15%? Burnley’s Liberal Democrat MP, the boastful Gordon Birtwistle, says he has secured the cash for a brand new A&E department or Urgent Care Centre at Burnley General Hospital. Never a man to sell himself short, Birtwistle tells the Lancashire Telegraph I’ve got money approved down in London providing they (the hospital trust) get the bid in before April 4. I’m not bothered about what it’s called as long as we get back what we had before. Birtwistle’s bombshell takes everyone by surprise. There is no mention of a £12m capital project in the East Lancashire Hospital’s 2011-12 business plan which covers the period 2011-2016 (see attached). The Trust plans to incorporate the Royal Blackburn’s Urgent Care Centre into its Emergency Department. But there is no mention of any souped up UCC at Burnley. If Birtwistle delivers the cash he promises, will the sparkling new building still be an Urgent Care Centre – a designation he likened previously to a “first aid post”? Meanwhile, in the constituency next door, Pendle’s Conservative MP, Andrew Stephenson, is holding out for the A&E badge to be reinstated. He told readers of the local rag, the Nelson Leader: Since my election, I am happy to say that the Urgent Care Centre at Burnley is now receiving more ambulances, however the majority of blue-light cases are still going to Blackburn. This is good news, but I still want to see Burnley General have its A&E designation reinstated in full. I have been keeping up the pressure on the Department of Health, who are undertaking a national review into how urgent and emergency care services are categorised, the “nomenclature review”. Unfortunately, the review is taking a long time, but as ridiculous as it sounds there has never been a proper definition of what services an Urgent Care Centre or A&E Department should provide. I dare say all will become clear in due course.
|
|||
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 21:23 |


Privacy



